<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 54 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60915</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 1,83,570 as it was deemed unnecessary and unjustified after the application of the flat profit rate. The judgment emphasized the objective of section 40A(3) to prevent fictitious transactions rather than penalize the assessee, leading to the decision to overturn the addition based on cash payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 54 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60915</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 1,83,570 as it was deemed unnecessary and unjustified after the application of the flat profit rate. The judgment emphasized the objective of section 40A(3) to prevent fictitious transactions rather than penalize the assessee, leading to the decision to overturn the addition based on cash payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>