https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60909 The Tribunal partly allowed all four appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on issues related to depreciation and investment allowance on poultry sheds, ESA on poultry shed, fencing, well, and water-tank, and the disallowance of expenditure on staff and guests. However, the claim for water-line in residential quarters was not pressed and thus not allowed. The issue of entertainment expenses was also not pressed and consequently rejected by the Tribunal. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:08:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60909 The Tribunal partly allowed all four appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on issues related to depreciation and investment allowance on poultry sheds, ESA on poultry shed, fencing, well, and water-tank, and the disallowance of expenditure on staff and guests. However, the claim for water-line in residential quarters was not pressed and thus not allowed. The issue of entertainment expenses was also not pressed and consequently rejected by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60909