<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 142 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee, a hotel business, was not eligible for investment allowance under section 32A of the Act for plant and machinery, as hotels were deemed trading activities and did not involve the production of any article or thing. The Tribunal rejected the argument that significant income from the restaurant should qualify for the allowance, emphasizing that the entire hotel operation must be for production or manufacture to be eligible. Citing decisions from various High Courts, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee was not entitled to the investment allowance based on the interpretation of relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 142 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee, a hotel business, was not eligible for investment allowance under section 32A of the Act for plant and machinery, as hotels were deemed trading activities and did not involve the production of any article or thing. The Tribunal rejected the argument that significant income from the restaurant should qualify for the allowance, emphasizing that the entire hotel operation must be for production or manufacture to be eligible. Citing decisions from various High Courts, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee was not entitled to the investment allowance based on the interpretation of relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>