<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 98 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the recomputation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on the finally assessed income of Rs. 62,651, subject to verification of a credit of Rs. 10,140. While upholding the addition of Rs. 2,14,000 as concealed income, the Tribunal ensured that the penalty was calculated accurately based on the correct income amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 98 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the recomputation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on the finally assessed income of Rs. 62,651, subject to verification of a credit of Rs. 10,140. While upholding the addition of Rs. 2,14,000 as concealed income, the Tribunal ensured that the penalty was calculated accurately based on the correct income amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>