<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 63 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60896</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed. The Tribunal upheld the charging of interest under section 215, emphasizing that the issue was debatable and not an apparent mistake for rectification under section 154. The Tribunal also clarified that the reassessment was limited to recalculating the interest and allowing consequential relief, not revisiting the chargeability of interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:41:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 63 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60896</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed. The Tribunal upheld the charging of interest under section 215, emphasizing that the issue was debatable and not an apparent mistake for rectification under section 154. The Tribunal also clarified that the reassessment was limited to recalculating the interest and allowing consequential relief, not revisiting the chargeability of interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>