<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 133 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60872</link>
    <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 applies only where property is transferred for inadequate consideration, and the revenue must first prove that condition before the deeming fiction can operate. On the facts discussed, the assessee supported the share sale with contemporaneous comparable transactions, public advertisements, correspondence, and prior group cases showing genuineness, while the revenue relied mainly on break-up valuation and did not produce comparable evidence to show the price was unfair or unreasonable. As the statutory precondition was not established, the deemed gift treatment could not be sustained and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 133 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60872</link>
      <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 applies only where property is transferred for inadequate consideration, and the revenue must first prove that condition before the deeming fiction can operate. On the facts discussed, the assessee supported the share sale with contemporaneous comparable transactions, public advertisements, correspondence, and prior group cases showing genuineness, while the revenue relied mainly on break-up valuation and did not produce comparable evidence to show the price was unfair or unreasonable. As the statutory precondition was not established, the deemed gift treatment could not be sustained and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>