<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60871</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the loss of Rs. 3,32,148 was not incidental to the assessee&#039;s business and arose from an infraction of law, thus not qualifying as an allowable deduction under tax laws. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the deduction was overturned, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to delete the addition was upheld on appeal by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:47:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60871</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the loss of Rs. 3,32,148 was not incidental to the assessee&#039;s business and arose from an infraction of law, thus not qualifying as an allowable deduction under tax laws. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the deduction was overturned, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to delete the addition was upheld on appeal by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>