<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 51 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60867</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the addition of Rs. 1,11,000 as income from undisclosed sources due to discrepancies in the accounts of the assessee. Additionally, the ITAT supported the valuation of the property sold by the assessee, with a potential modification based on the High Court&#039;s decision in an acquisition case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 51 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60867</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the addition of Rs. 1,11,000 as income from undisclosed sources due to discrepancies in the accounts of the assessee. Additionally, the ITAT supported the valuation of the property sold by the assessee, with a potential modification based on the High Court&#039;s decision in an acquisition case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>