<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Rs. 2,50,000 set aside for marriage expenses of Archana Singal should not be included in the appellant&#039;s taxable wealth. The Tribunal found this act to be justified by the moral and legal obligations under Hindu Law, emphasizing that the provisions regarding partial partition do not extend to such acts. The appeals were allowed, and the lower authorities&#039; decisions were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:00:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Rs. 2,50,000 set aside for marriage expenses of Archana Singal should not be included in the appellant&#039;s taxable wealth. The Tribunal found this act to be justified by the moral and legal obligations under Hindu Law, emphasizing that the provisions regarding partial partition do not extend to such acts. The appeals were allowed, and the lower authorities&#039; decisions were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>