<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 88 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60835</link>
    <description>A transfer of immovable property pursuant to a decree was not protected as a genuine family arrangement where the property remained the individual asset of the assessee, no antecedent family right or common hotchpotch was shown, and the decree appeared collusive and tax-motivated. An unregistered transfer of immovable property also failed to satisfy the statutory formalities for a valid gift, so it could not be treated as a taxable gift. The valuation adopted by the authorities was left undisturbed, while deductions were confined to proved loans and the exemption allowed only to the extent already granted after set-off of the wife&#039;s contribution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 12:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 88 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60835</link>
      <description>A transfer of immovable property pursuant to a decree was not protected as a genuine family arrangement where the property remained the individual asset of the assessee, no antecedent family right or common hotchpotch was shown, and the decree appeared collusive and tax-motivated. An unregistered transfer of immovable property also failed to satisfy the statutory formalities for a valid gift, so it could not be treated as a taxable gift. The valuation adopted by the authorities was left undisturbed, while deductions were confined to proved loans and the exemption allowed only to the extent already granted after set-off of the wife&#039;s contribution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>