<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 100 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60834</link>
    <description>A partnership firm was entitled to registration where the deed, read as a whole, disclosed the partners&#039; intended profit-sharing ratio even without express fractional words. The instrument referred to distribution of profits and losses in proportion to respective shares, tied division to an earlier clause, and left unstated matters to the Partnership Act. Equal capital contribution, equal profit entries in the accounts, and the registration form showing a half-and-half ratio supported an inference of equal shares. Specification of shares under the income-tax law was therefore satisfied by the deed and surrounding facts, and refusal of registration was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 12:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 100 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60834</link>
      <description>A partnership firm was entitled to registration where the deed, read as a whole, disclosed the partners&#039; intended profit-sharing ratio even without express fractional words. The instrument referred to distribution of profits and losses in proportion to respective shares, tied division to an earlier clause, and left unstated matters to the Partnership Act. Equal capital contribution, equal profit entries in the accounts, and the registration form showing a half-and-half ratio supported an inference of equal shares. Specification of shares under the income-tax law was therefore satisfied by the deed and surrounding facts, and refusal of registration was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>