<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 83 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision directing the ITO to allow continuation of registration to the appellant firm, Luxmi Rice Mills, for the assessment year 1978-79. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of not solely relying on expert opinions, considered the partner&#039;s clarification on her signatures, and highlighted the need to give the firm an opportunity to rectify defects before refusing registration. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the holistic assessment of facts and caution against overreliance on expert opinions, ultimately affirming the continuation of registration for the appellant firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 83 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision directing the ITO to allow continuation of registration to the appellant firm, Luxmi Rice Mills, for the assessment year 1978-79. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of not solely relying on expert opinions, considered the partner&#039;s clarification on her signatures, and highlighted the need to give the firm an opportunity to rectify defects before refusing registration. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the holistic assessment of facts and caution against overreliance on expert opinions, ultimately affirming the continuation of registration for the appellant firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>