<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60816</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a dispute over exemption under section 10(26B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a company established by the Haryana Government for the welfare of Scheduled Castes, holding that the entire income was exempt from tax under section 10(26B). Despite the revenue&#039;s argument that the assessee was not wholly financed by the Government, the Tribunal found evidence supporting full government financing, qualifying the assessee for the exemption. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee&#039;s establishment and financing aligned with the purpose of the provision, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60816</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a dispute over exemption under section 10(26B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a company established by the Haryana Government for the welfare of Scheduled Castes, holding that the entire income was exempt from tax under section 10(26B). Despite the revenue&#039;s argument that the assessee was not wholly financed by the Government, the Tribunal found evidence supporting full government financing, qualifying the assessee for the exemption. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee&#039;s establishment and financing aligned with the purpose of the provision, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>