<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 58 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the statutory limitations on the AAC&#039;s powers and the exclusive discretion of the WTO in referring asset valuation to the Valuation Officer under section 16A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The judgment clarified the boundaries of authority in appeal proceedings and upheld the principle that appellate directions must align with legal provisions and not infringe upon the discretion vested in the assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:49:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 58 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the statutory limitations on the AAC&#039;s powers and the exclusive discretion of the WTO in referring asset valuation to the Valuation Officer under section 16A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The judgment clarified the boundaries of authority in appeal proceedings and upheld the principle that appellate directions must align with legal provisions and not infringe upon the discretion vested in the assessing officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>