<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 83 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60805</link>
    <description>The deceased partner&#039;s share in a partnership firm&#039;s investment allowance reserve was treated as property passing on death for estate duty purposes, because sections 5 and 6 of the Estate Duty Act bring within charge property passing on death or within the deceased&#039;s disposing capacity. However, the reserve was subject to the statutory limitations in section 32A(5) of the Income-tax Act and the related consequences under section 155(4A), so the interest could not be valued as an unrestricted asset. The deceased had a real but circumscribed right in the reserve, and valuation had to reflect the remaining utilisation period and surrounding facts, resulting in inclusion at a discounted amount rather than full face value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 83 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60805</link>
      <description>The deceased partner&#039;s share in a partnership firm&#039;s investment allowance reserve was treated as property passing on death for estate duty purposes, because sections 5 and 6 of the Estate Duty Act bring within charge property passing on death or within the deceased&#039;s disposing capacity. However, the reserve was subject to the statutory limitations in section 32A(5) of the Income-tax Act and the related consequences under section 155(4A), so the interest could not be valued as an unrestricted asset. The deceased had a real but circumscribed right in the reserve, and valuation had to reflect the remaining utilisation period and surrounding facts, resulting in inclusion at a discounted amount rather than full face value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>