<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 67 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the jurisdiction of the ITO, central circle VI, and recognizing the assessee&#039;s status as HUF for the inclusion of dividend income, bank interest, and annuity refund. The charging of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was upheld, subject to consequential relief based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the status issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:26:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 67 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the jurisdiction of the ITO, central circle VI, and recognizing the assessee&#039;s status as HUF for the inclusion of dividend income, bank interest, and annuity refund. The charging of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was upheld, subject to consequential relief based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the status issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>