<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the payments labeled as &#039;commission&#039; were trade discounts, not subject to tax deduction at source. It found the demand raised under section 154 unjustified, allowing the appeal and canceling the order. The Tribunal emphasized the commercial nature of the transactions and the relationship between the parties as seller and buyer, not principal and agent. The issue of tax deduction at source was deemed unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the payments labeled as &#039;commission&#039; were trade discounts, not subject to tax deduction at source. It found the demand raised under section 154 unjustified, allowing the appeal and canceling the order. The Tribunal emphasized the commercial nature of the transactions and the relationship between the parties as seller and buyer, not principal and agent. The issue of tax deduction at source was deemed unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>