<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 226 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60776</link>
    <description>The Departmental appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income under &quot;House property&quot; and other sources for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal found that the Finance Minister&#039;s clarification and CBDT Circular No. 762 supported the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation, leading to the conclusion that the CIT(A) rightly directed the AO to revise the income computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 226 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60776</link>
      <description>The Departmental appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income under &quot;House property&quot; and other sources for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal found that the Finance Minister&#039;s clarification and CBDT Circular No. 762 supported the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation, leading to the conclusion that the CIT(A) rightly directed the AO to revise the income computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>