<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 44 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60773</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the AO&#039;s assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue. The CIT&#039;s decision to set aside the AO&#039;s order based on incomplete enquiries and to extend the limitation period was deemed inappropriate. The ITAT ruled that the CIT&#039;s actions were unjustified, quashed the CIT&#039;s order, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 44 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60773</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the AO&#039;s assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue. The CIT&#039;s decision to set aside the AO&#039;s order based on incomplete enquiries and to extend the limitation period was deemed inappropriate. The ITAT ruled that the CIT&#039;s actions were unjustified, quashed the CIT&#039;s order, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>