<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 186 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, admitting additional grounds of appeal as legal issues without new facts. It declared the initiation of proceedings under Section 10 of the Interest Tax Act invalid due to lack of proper jurisdictional basis. Furthermore, the Tribunal determined that the assessee did not qualify as a &quot;credit institution&quot; under Sections 2(5A) and 2(5B) of the Interest Tax Act, as its principal business activities were not finance-related. Consequently, the charging section 4 was deemed inapplicable, and the assessee was not liable to file an Interest Tax return, leading to the quashing of the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 186 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, admitting additional grounds of appeal as legal issues without new facts. It declared the initiation of proceedings under Section 10 of the Interest Tax Act invalid due to lack of proper jurisdictional basis. Furthermore, the Tribunal determined that the assessee did not qualify as a &quot;credit institution&quot; under Sections 2(5A) and 2(5B) of the Interest Tax Act, as its principal business activities were not finance-related. Consequently, the charging section 4 was deemed inapplicable, and the assessee was not liable to file an Interest Tax return, leading to the quashing of the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>