<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the departmental appeal by modifying the disallowance of consultancy expenses, upholding the book profit method for calculating profits on the sale of green tea leaves, restoring the levy of interest under section 139(8), and directing reconsideration of interest under sections 215 and 220(2) based on recalculated tax. The Tribunal noted that certain orders of the CIT(A) went beyond their powers, leading to adjustments in the final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the departmental appeal by modifying the disallowance of consultancy expenses, upholding the book profit method for calculating profits on the sale of green tea leaves, restoring the levy of interest under section 139(8), and directing reconsideration of interest under sections 215 and 220(2) based on recalculated tax. The Tribunal noted that certain orders of the CIT(A) went beyond their powers, leading to adjustments in the final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>