<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 99 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60645</link>
    <description>In a tax commentary on composite business deductions and allied disallowances, prior consistent relief was followed to hold that incentive wages were not disallowable, as no fresh material justified a different view. MODVAT adjustments were treated as revenue-neutral and did not require further addition to closing stock absent proof of profit distortion. Export profits of the Haldia unit were to be computed under the composite-business approach for export deduction purposes. Deduction under section 32AB could not be denied merely because deposits and investments were not traced to each receipt, where common-fund accounting and audit evidence showed compliance. Staff recreation club payments were treated as welfare expenditure and not hit by the disallowance provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 05:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 99 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60645</link>
      <description>In a tax commentary on composite business deductions and allied disallowances, prior consistent relief was followed to hold that incentive wages were not disallowable, as no fresh material justified a different view. MODVAT adjustments were treated as revenue-neutral and did not require further addition to closing stock absent proof of profit distortion. Export profits of the Haldia unit were to be computed under the composite-business approach for export deduction purposes. Deduction under section 32AB could not be denied merely because deposits and investments were not traced to each receipt, where common-fund accounting and audit evidence showed compliance. Staff recreation club payments were treated as welfare expenditure and not hit by the disallowance provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>