<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 94 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the revenue&#039;s appeals. It directed a re-examination of the depreciation claim on aluminium cops, upheld the disallowance of sales promotion and guest house expenses, allowed legal expenses for amalgamation as revenue expenditure, and reinstated the addition for under charges received but not disclosed in taxable income. The Tribunal also condoned the revenue&#039;s appeal delay of 13 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:49:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 94 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the revenue&#039;s appeals. It directed a re-examination of the depreciation claim on aluminium cops, upheld the disallowance of sales promotion and guest house expenses, allowed legal expenses for amalgamation as revenue expenditure, and reinstated the addition for under charges received but not disclosed in taxable income. The Tribunal also condoned the revenue&#039;s appeal delay of 13 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>