<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 67 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the return filed by the assessee was defective but not invalid due to the signature issue, which was deemed curable. As a result, the notice issued under section 148 to re-open the assessment was considered without jurisdiction, leading to the invalidation of the assessment made on 23-1-1989. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing rectification of procedural defects and ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 67 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the return filed by the assessee was defective but not invalid due to the signature issue, which was deemed curable. As a result, the notice issued under section 148 to re-open the assessment was considered without jurisdiction, leading to the invalidation of the assessment made on 23-1-1989. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing rectification of procedural defects and ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>