<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was deemed unjustified and cancelled. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of a bona fide belief and complete disclosure in assessing the presence of concealment, emphasizing that the assessee had acted in good faith and disclosed all relevant information to the tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was deemed unjustified and cancelled. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of a bona fide belief and complete disclosure in assessing the presence of concealment, emphasizing that the assessee had acted in good faith and disclosed all relevant information to the tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>