<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 133 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s power to enhance the assessment under section 251(1)(a). However, it directed the ITO to allow the set-off of unabsorbed carry-forward losses, finding that the assessee was carrying on business during the relevant period. The other issues regarding specific claims and charging of interest were not pressed and therefore not decided by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:49:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 133 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s power to enhance the assessment under section 251(1)(a). However, it directed the ITO to allow the set-off of unabsorbed carry-forward losses, finding that the assessee was carrying on business during the relevant period. The other issues regarding specific claims and charging of interest were not pressed and therefore not decided by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>