<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 96 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60602</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to treat a hotel building as plant for depreciation purposes, emphasizing the functional test and nature of use in determining classification. Referring to precedents, including the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel, the Tribunal concluded that the building served as a tool of trade for the business, qualifying it as plant. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of functionality in such classifications, ultimately dismissing the appeals and supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 96 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60602</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to treat a hotel building as plant for depreciation purposes, emphasizing the functional test and nature of use in determining classification. Referring to precedents, including the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel, the Tribunal concluded that the building served as a tool of trade for the business, qualifying it as plant. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of functionality in such classifications, ultimately dismissing the appeals and supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>