<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 102 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, affirming the legality of charging interest under section 139(8) treating a registered firm as unregistered. The Tribunal held that the omission to charge interest was a clear mistake and rectifiable under section 154, despite the issue being debatable. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, emphasizing that the tax liability should be calculated as if the firm were unregistered, as per Explanation 2 to section 139(8).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 102 - ITAT CALCUTTA-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, affirming the legality of charging interest under section 139(8) treating a registered firm as unregistered. The Tribunal held that the omission to charge interest was a clear mistake and rectifiable under section 154, despite the issue being debatable. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, emphasizing that the tax liability should be calculated as if the firm were unregistered, as per Explanation 2 to section 139(8).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>