<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 206 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60565</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeals of all five assessees, affirming that they were to be taxed as residents in India. The ITAT concluded that the assessees did not meet the criteria for not ordinarily resident status and found that they all met the conditions for being considered residents in India as per the Income-tax Act. The arguments based on previous judgments were rejected, and the ITAT ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the taxability of the salaries earned abroad by the assessees in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 206 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60565</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeals of all five assessees, affirming that they were to be taxed as residents in India. The ITAT concluded that the assessees did not meet the criteria for not ordinarily resident status and found that they all met the conditions for being considered residents in India as per the Income-tax Act. The arguments based on previous judgments were rejected, and the ITAT ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the taxability of the salaries earned abroad by the assessees in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>