<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 113 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60545</link>
    <description>Rectification power under section 154 cannot be used to withdraw interest granted under section 214 where the dispute turns on whether delayed advance-tax instalments affect entitlement. The point was not an obvious or patent mistake; it depended on competing judicial views on the treatment of advance-tax payments and the resulting interest. Because a debatable issue falls outside the narrow scope of rectification, the attempted withdrawal of interest was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:19:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 113 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60545</link>
      <description>Rectification power under section 154 cannot be used to withdraw interest granted under section 214 where the dispute turns on whether delayed advance-tax instalments affect entitlement. The point was not an obvious or patent mistake; it depended on competing judicial views on the treatment of advance-tax payments and the resulting interest. Because a debatable issue falls outside the narrow scope of rectification, the attempted withdrawal of interest was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>