<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 160 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of a capital loss claimed on the sale of shares, citing lack of bona fides and collusive nature of transactions. Additionally, the disallowance of interest paid and denial of set-off for brought forward capital loss were confirmed. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were not genuine commercial dealings but artificial arrangements within related companies, thus dismissing the appeals and denying the tax benefits sought by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 160 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of a capital loss claimed on the sale of shares, citing lack of bona fides and collusive nature of transactions. Additionally, the disallowance of interest paid and denial of set-off for brought forward capital loss were confirmed. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions were not genuine commercial dealings but artificial arrangements within related companies, thus dismissing the appeals and denying the tax benefits sought by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>