<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Commissioner of Wealth-tax&#039;s decision to categorize rental income from factory sheds as income from house property for wealth-tax assessment. The Tribunal differentiated the case from previous precedents, emphasizing the independent business activities of the tenant and the absence of commercial exploitation of assets by the assessee. Referring to the legislative intent behind relevant provisions, the Tribunal concluded that the rental income did not fall under any specific category for wealth-tax valuation, affirming the CWT&#039;s order based on case laws like Bithal Das v. CWT and CWT v. Mishrilal Jain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Commissioner of Wealth-tax&#039;s decision to categorize rental income from factory sheds as income from house property for wealth-tax assessment. The Tribunal differentiated the case from previous precedents, emphasizing the independent business activities of the tenant and the absence of commercial exploitation of assets by the assessee. Referring to the legislative intent behind relevant provisions, the Tribunal concluded that the rental income did not fall under any specific category for wealth-tax valuation, affirming the CWT&#039;s order based on case laws like Bithal Das v. CWT and CWT v. Mishrilal Jain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>