<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 140 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of the additions of Rs. 44,90,434 and Rs. 25,42,968. It held that the assessee&#039;s hybrid system of accounting, recognizing interest income on a cash basis while maintaining accrual for expenses, was acceptable. The change was deemed bona fide, regularly followed, and provided a realistic picture of the company&#039;s financial position. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent application of the new method for a true determination of profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 140 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of the additions of Rs. 44,90,434 and Rs. 25,42,968. It held that the assessee&#039;s hybrid system of accounting, recognizing interest income on a cash basis while maintaining accrual for expenses, was acceptable. The change was deemed bona fide, regularly followed, and provided a realistic picture of the company&#039;s financial position. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent application of the new method for a true determination of profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>