<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60479</link>
    <description>Section 43B was applied to unpaid statutory liabilities: excise duty disallowance was sustained because the liability was treated as effectively adjusted through accounting entries, while unpaid sales tax was sent back for verification under the first proviso. Interest under section 215 had to be recomputed by excluding the section 43B addition where a binding stay meant the amount was not chargeable to advance tax. Deduction claims for workers&#039; benevolent fund contribution were allowed, medical reimbursement and related employee expenditure required fresh examination, depreciation and investment allowance issues were remanded for factual verification, additional relief under sections 80J and 80HH was sent back on merits, and the bad debt claim was rejected as an afterthought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60479</link>
      <description>Section 43B was applied to unpaid statutory liabilities: excise duty disallowance was sustained because the liability was treated as effectively adjusted through accounting entries, while unpaid sales tax was sent back for verification under the first proviso. Interest under section 215 had to be recomputed by excluding the section 43B addition where a binding stay meant the amount was not chargeable to advance tax. Deduction claims for workers&#039; benevolent fund contribution were allowed, medical reimbursement and related employee expenditure required fresh examination, depreciation and investment allowance issues were remanded for factual verification, additional relief under sections 80J and 80HH was sent back on merits, and the bad debt claim was rejected as an afterthought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>