<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the interest income from short-term fixed deposits belonged to the assessee, not the non-resident principals, despite initial crediting based on RBI&#039;s instructions. The Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed wrong in removing the Rs. 3,43,573 addition from the assessment. The Tribunal reversed the Commissioner&#039;s decision, siding with the ITO and allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT CALCUTTA-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the interest income from short-term fixed deposits belonged to the assessee, not the non-resident principals, despite initial crediting based on RBI&#039;s instructions. The Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed wrong in removing the Rs. 3,43,573 addition from the assessment. The Tribunal reversed the Commissioner&#039;s decision, siding with the ITO and allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>