<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 260 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the additional liability due to exchange rate fluctuations, rejecting the department&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal determined that the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation and investment allowance based on the mercantile system of accounting, aligning with the decision in Kanoria Chemicals &amp;amp; Industries Ltd. and disregarding the conflicting interpretation in Century Enka Ltd. The President, acting as the Third Member, resolved the disagreement by emphasizing the applicability of section 43A and the absence of a requirement for actual payment in claiming the enhanced liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 260 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the additional liability due to exchange rate fluctuations, rejecting the department&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal determined that the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation and investment allowance based on the mercantile system of accounting, aligning with the decision in Kanoria Chemicals &amp;amp; Industries Ltd. and disregarding the conflicting interpretation in Century Enka Ltd. The President, acting as the Third Member, resolved the disagreement by emphasizing the applicability of section 43A and the absence of a requirement for actual payment in claiming the enhanced liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>