<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 212 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60332</link>
    <description>The DC(A) set aside the original assessment orders dated 29-9-1984, directing reconsideration by the ITO. The reassessment orders dated 29-1-1990 were timely under section 153(2A) and valid based on DC(A)&#039;s directions. The DC(A) erred in canceling the reassessment orders, as they were within jurisdiction. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, reversing the DC(A)&#039;s cancellation of the reassessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 212 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60332</link>
      <description>The DC(A) set aside the original assessment orders dated 29-9-1984, directing reconsideration by the ITO. The reassessment orders dated 29-1-1990 were timely under section 153(2A) and valid based on DC(A)&#039;s directions. The DC(A) erred in canceling the reassessment orders, as they were within jurisdiction. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, reversing the DC(A)&#039;s cancellation of the reassessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>