<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 122 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority decision, concluded that the assessee should be given the benefit of doubt and the penalties for concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be canceled. The dissenting opinion and the Third Member&#039;s agreement led to the conclusion that the penalty was not justified, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 122 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority decision, concluded that the assessee should be given the benefit of doubt and the penalties for concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be canceled. The dissenting opinion and the Third Member&#039;s agreement led to the conclusion that the penalty was not justified, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>