<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 100 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings due to incorrect initiation under section 273(1)(b) and lack of a proper notice under section 273(1)(a). Emphasizing the need for a specific charge notice, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and quashed the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. It was clarified that the CIT(A) lacks authority to remit the penalty for reconsideration. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 100 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings due to incorrect initiation under section 273(1)(b) and lack of a proper notice under section 273(1)(a). Emphasizing the need for a specific charge notice, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and quashed the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. It was clarified that the CIT(A) lacks authority to remit the penalty for reconsideration. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>