<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 108 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60320</link>
    <description>The tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 68,775 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, in favor of the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of independent findings in the penalty order, the bona fide nature of the assessee&#039;s explanation, and the failure of the ITO to verify the genuineness of the cash subscriptions during the penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 108 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60320</link>
      <description>The tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 68,775 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, in favor of the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of independent findings in the penalty order, the bona fide nature of the assessee&#039;s explanation, and the failure of the ITO to verify the genuineness of the cash subscriptions during the penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>