<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 51 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Wealth-tax Officer had no jurisdiction to issue reopening notices under section 17(1)(b) as they were time-barred. Consequently, the reassessments for the years 1970-71 to 1973-74 were quashed, and the valuation dispute regarding the half share in a property was not addressed due to the invalidity of the reopening actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:15:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 51 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Wealth-tax Officer had no jurisdiction to issue reopening notices under section 17(1)(b) as they were time-barred. Consequently, the reassessments for the years 1970-71 to 1973-74 were quashed, and the valuation dispute regarding the half share in a property was not addressed due to the invalidity of the reopening actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>