<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 112 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction in entertaining a challenge to the CIT&#039;s order under section 263. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and hierarchy of appellate authorities. The appeal was directed to be restored to the CIT(A) for merit-based disposal, underscoring the importance of following prescribed avenues for challenging tax assessments under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 112 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction in entertaining a challenge to the CIT&#039;s order under section 263. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and hierarchy of appellate authorities. The appeal was directed to be restored to the CIT(A) for merit-based disposal, underscoring the importance of following prescribed avenues for challenging tax assessments under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>