https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60292 The Tribunal held that the absence of a partner's signature in the declaration for continuation of registration did not render the firm ineligible for registration as an Unregistered Firm (U.R.F). Disputes between partners affecting day-to-day business operations were deemed irrelevant as long as the firm remained genuine. The Tribunal directed the Income-tax Officer to grant continuation of registration to the firm, as the absence of the partner's signature was the main ground for denial. The legal representative of a deceased partner was not required to sign in this case, and the firm satisfied the registration requirements. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:32:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60292 The Tribunal held that the absence of a partner's signature in the declaration for continuation of registration did not render the firm ineligible for registration as an Unregistered Firm (U.R.F). Disputes between partners affecting day-to-day business operations were deemed irrelevant as long as the firm remained genuine. The Tribunal directed the Income-tax Officer to grant continuation of registration to the firm, as the absence of the partner's signature was the main ground for denial. The legal representative of a deceased partner was not required to sign in this case, and the firm satisfied the registration requirements. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60292