<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 115 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the increased depreciation rate introduced from 24-7-1980 would not apply to trucks and buses used before that date. Therefore, the department&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant depreciation at the higher rate of 40%. The Tribunal emphasized that amendments to substantive law are not retrospective unless explicitly stated, and assets acquired before the effective date of the amendment are not eligible for the increased depreciation rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:10:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 115 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the increased depreciation rate introduced from 24-7-1980 would not apply to trucks and buses used before that date. Therefore, the department&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant depreciation at the higher rate of 40%. The Tribunal emphasized that amendments to substantive law are not retrospective unless explicitly stated, and assets acquired before the effective date of the amendment are not eligible for the increased depreciation rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>