<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 80 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60260</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147(b) requires post-assessment information and a bona fide belief of escapement; the reopening on audit and existing legal material was invalid. Interest on sticky advances credited to suspense account was treated on the real-income principle and was not taxable where recovery was doubtful. Dividend-related adjustments under section 80M and the Unit Trust of India receipt were examined under the dividend-tax framework, with the statutory treatment substantially upheld. Development rebate on banking assets depended on the asset&#039;s character and office-use restrictions, while revaluation loss on shares and securities held as stock-in-trade was allowable on commercial principles, with part of the rebate issue remanded for factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 80 - ITAT CALCUTTA-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60260</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147(b) requires post-assessment information and a bona fide belief of escapement; the reopening on audit and existing legal material was invalid. Interest on sticky advances credited to suspense account was treated on the real-income principle and was not taxable where recovery was doubtful. Dividend-related adjustments under section 80M and the Unit Trust of India receipt were examined under the dividend-tax framework, with the statutory treatment substantially upheld. Development rebate on banking assets depended on the asset&#039;s character and office-use restrictions, while revaluation loss on shares and securities held as stock-in-trade was allowable on commercial principles, with part of the rebate issue remanded for factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>