<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 147 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment under s. 147(b) lacked valid jurisdiction due to the absence of fresh information post-original assessment, following the precedent set in Bankipur Club. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the calculation of the deduction for head office expenses under s. 44C, finding the reassessment order unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:45:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 147 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment under s. 147(b) lacked valid jurisdiction due to the absence of fresh information post-original assessment, following the precedent set in Bankipur Club. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the calculation of the deduction for head office expenses under s. 44C, finding the reassessment order unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>