<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 120 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77 as the audit party&#039;s opinion on eligibility for section 80J deductions was considered an interpretation of law, invalidating the reassessment proceedings. However, for the assessment year 1977-78, where the audit highlighted non-compliance with filing requirements under section 80J(6A), the reassessment was upheld. The CIT (A) directed the reassessment for all years to be reexamined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 120 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77 as the audit party&#039;s opinion on eligibility for section 80J deductions was considered an interpretation of law, invalidating the reassessment proceedings. However, for the assessment year 1977-78, where the audit highlighted non-compliance with filing requirements under section 80J(6A), the reassessment was upheld. The CIT (A) directed the reassessment for all years to be reexamined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>