<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 255 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed departmental appeals. Capital gains were computed based on the sale consideration of Rs. 67,10,000, with the excess amount of Rs. 72,90,000 deemed diverted by an overriding title. The agreement for sale dated 31-8-1988 created a legal right for Premium Estate to purchase the property at the specified amount, and the assessees were obligated not to receive any additional consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 255 - ITAT CALCUTTA-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed departmental appeals. Capital gains were computed based on the sale consideration of Rs. 67,10,000, with the excess amount of Rs. 72,90,000 deemed diverted by an overriding title. The agreement for sale dated 31-8-1988 created a legal right for Premium Estate to purchase the property at the specified amount, and the assessees were obligated not to receive any additional consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>