<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 236 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60031</link>
    <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed, resulting in the deletion of additions under section 40A(3) for assessment years 2000-01 and 2003-04, as well as the deletion of the Rs. 50,000 addition for alleged transport charges for assessment year 2003-04. The Third Member, concurring with the Judicial Member, emphasized the need for concrete evidence to support expense claims, leading to the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 236 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60031</link>
      <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed, resulting in the deletion of additions under section 40A(3) for assessment years 2000-01 and 2003-04, as well as the deletion of the Rs. 50,000 addition for alleged transport charges for assessment year 2003-04. The Third Member, concurring with the Judicial Member, emphasized the need for concrete evidence to support expense claims, leading to the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>