<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 72 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60011</link>
    <description>Section 161(1) makes a representative assessee&#039;s liability co-extensive with the liability of the persons represented, so tax must be levied and recovered in the same manner and to the same extent as those persons&#039; liability. In the context of income received by joint receivers on behalf of erstwhile partners, the income could be assessed in the status of an association of persons, but the tax computation could not ignore the individual liability of the represented partners. The principle applied was that representative taxation depends on the liability of the persons represented, rather than on taxing the collective income of the AOP as a single unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:44:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 72 - ITAT CALCUTTA-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60011</link>
      <description>Section 161(1) makes a representative assessee&#039;s liability co-extensive with the liability of the persons represented, so tax must be levied and recovered in the same manner and to the same extent as those persons&#039; liability. In the context of income received by joint receivers on behalf of erstwhile partners, the income could be assessed in the status of an association of persons, but the tax computation could not ignore the individual liability of the represented partners. The principle applied was that representative taxation depends on the liability of the persons represented, rather than on taxing the collective income of the AOP as a single unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>